Last night the Hustler Casino (California) used continuous shuffle machines for its blackjack tournaments for the first time. The tournament director said the machines would speed up the game as the dealers would not have to hand shuffle the cards. It seemed that the discards were put into the CSM after every three hands.
I found the experience frustrating and played poorly (four $55 buy-ins with no advancement.) I decided to quit supporting this tournament, but on my way home I had plenty of time to reconsider. The CSMs could be used for an advantage since the players use their tournament chips to bank the Action. For more info on how the game is "banked" see my posts for 2/15/07 and 2/17/07.
I am thinking that since CSMs greatly favor the house or in this case the banker, why not just make minimum bets and try to accomplish catch-up bets and swings while acting as the banker when hopefully you have an advantage.
I found the experience frustrating and played poorly (four $55 buy-ins with no advancement.) I decided to quit supporting this tournament, but on my way home I had plenty of time to reconsider. The CSMs could be used for an advantage since the players use their tournament chips to bank the Action. For more info on how the game is "banked" see my posts for 2/15/07 and 2/17/07.
I am thinking that since CSMs greatly favor the house or in this case the banker, why not just make minimum bets and try to accomplish catch-up bets and swings while acting as the banker when hopefully you have an advantage.