Which one is better ?

PlayHunter

Active Member
Last hand, Min/max 100/500, no surrender.

1st scenario: BR1 1701 chips and bet 300, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500.

2nd scenario: BR1 1751 chips and bet 250, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500.

3rd scenario: BR1 1768 chips and bet 367, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500. - How much it improves for BR2 if responds with a bet of 465 instead 500 ?

What are the percents for each scenario ?
 
Last edited:
Last hand, Min/max 100/500, no surrender.

1st scenario: BR1 1701 chips and bet 300, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500.
BR1 wins 62.15%, BR2 37.85%
2nd scenario: BR1 1751 chips and bet 250, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500.
BR1 wins 67.95%, BR2 32.05%
3rd scenario: BR1 1768 chips and bet 367, BR2 1500 chips and bet 500.
BR1 wins 73.40%, BR2 26.60%
- How much it improves for BR2 if responds with a bet of 465 instead 500 ?
BR1 wins 65.04%, BR2 34.96%. A good lesson. Betting 500 did not gain anything, but it gave up beating BR1's losing double with a single bet loss.
 
One more: (same rules 100/500 no surrender) BR1 1901 chips and bet 400, and BR2 1500 and bet 500. - This is ~79% and neither player can improve his bet ?
 
BR1 wins 62.15%, BR2 37.85%

BR1 wins 67.95%, BR2 32.05%

BR1 wins 73.40%, BR2 26.60%

BR1 wins 65.04%, BR2 34.96%. A good lesson. Betting 500 did not gain anything, but it gave up beating BR1's losing double with a single bet loss.

Hi Gronbog, team

I know this is an old thread but I wanted to know how the % were calculated or simulated. Is there any software for this. Any comments would be helpful.

Thanks,
Arun
 
Back
Top