BughouseMaster
Banned User
I found this very interesting and wanted to ask the experts here the rationale behind this.... it says if we bet ahead of BR1 that our best bet is to bet half our bankroll, but then states in ()'s that we only need to bet double our deficit + a chip but how was that determined? The book doesn't go into great detail on this, but I'm interested in the math behind this because betting double our deficit + a chip is something I could easily remember if I'm BR2 going into the final hand and there are more than 2 players.
**SIDENOTE**
Now as I read on page 96 I'm confused because it says as BR2, we should keep 1 chip more than what BR3 keeps, but that totally contradicts what they suggested in paragraph 1! Moreover, the example on the next page states that we are BR2 with 500, on the button, BR1 (bets next) has 600, and BR3 has 480. Following the advice that they first recommended, double our deficit + a chip in this case would be 45 (20 x 2 + 5) but the solution says to "Bet at least 150, and maybe 200 or 250. You are hoping BR1 bets small after you."

Once again, thanks advance for your thoughts and responses!
**SIDENOTE**
Now as I read on page 96 I'm confused because it says as BR2, we should keep 1 chip more than what BR3 keeps, but that totally contradicts what they suggested in paragraph 1! Moreover, the example on the next page states that we are BR2 with 500, on the button, BR1 (bets next) has 600, and BR3 has 480. Following the advice that they first recommended, double our deficit + a chip in this case would be 45 (20 x 2 + 5) but the solution says to "Bet at least 150, and maybe 200 or 250. You are hoping BR1 bets small after you."
Once again, thanks advance for your thoughts and responses!
Last edited: