This is the hand that prevented me from reaching the Hilton finals in the April qualifier for MD2.
I'm in second place going into the hand, betting from second position behind the leader. Two players advance to the finals. Betting is $100 to $2500 and surrender is allowed.
The dealer has a 2 up.
A $11150 Bet $1000 Doubled ($2000 in action) Final hand = Stiff
Me $8660 Bet $2500 Cards T 2
C $5750 Bet $2500 Cards T 9
D $8000 Bet $2500 Cards A 5
E $6550 Bet $2500 Cards BJ
I was certainly pleased to see nobody behind me take second low. However, second low became meaningless once Player E had the blackjack, taking him to $10,300 assuming he accepts it without doubling.
There was some debate after the round whether I made the right choice here. At the table, I had little doubt that I needed to double, but in the ensuing discussion I began to second-guess the decision. Looking at it now, I don't understand what the dilemma was. Doubling looks like the only reasonable play. IIRC, the conversation revolved around the perils of giving up a low, but the low is long-gone already. FWIW, I busted the double-down.
If I don't double, I give the dealer-bust outcome to player D, who will certainly double behind me. Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
I'm in second place going into the hand, betting from second position behind the leader. Two players advance to the finals. Betting is $100 to $2500 and surrender is allowed.
The dealer has a 2 up.
A $11150 Bet $1000 Doubled ($2000 in action) Final hand = Stiff
Me $8660 Bet $2500 Cards T 2
C $5750 Bet $2500 Cards T 9
D $8000 Bet $2500 Cards A 5
E $6550 Bet $2500 Cards BJ
I was certainly pleased to see nobody behind me take second low. However, second low became meaningless once Player E had the blackjack, taking him to $10,300 assuming he accepts it without doubling.
There was some debate after the round whether I made the right choice here. At the table, I had little doubt that I needed to double, but in the ensuing discussion I began to second-guess the decision. Looking at it now, I don't understand what the dilemma was. Doubling looks like the only reasonable play. IIRC, the conversation revolved around the perils of giving up a low, but the low is long-gone already. FWIW, I busted the double-down.
If I don't double, I give the dealer-bust outcome to player D, who will certainly double behind me. Looks pretty cut and dry to me.