Not So free

[chipsmccoy]

Yes, right at 1000

How many players were there? Were there really close to 1,000?

Affirmative - just over 1000. On a related note, two of the seven at the finals' table did not purchase a Mulligan and at least one who did, did not use his during that round.

Chips

 

[Joep2]

A shame

The players really got hosed on this tournament


Joep2

 

[chipsmccoy]

Some more so than others

The players really got hosed on this tournament


Joep2

Some more so than others if you think about it. As it turns out for those skilled tournament players who did buy Mulligans - they became more valuable than just "maintaining" parity with the lower than suspected total number that bought them.

Chips

 

[Count de McArds]

Well Said BJFAN4

Very funny Big Tex. This reminds me a lot about BJ tournament afficiendos who complain on this site about being excluded from tournament invitationals, unless of course they are invited by UBT and /or WSOB.:joker: :joker: :joker:
Our principles are always accommodated by our own self-interest. I don't claim to be an exception.

Two very well stated and true observations!

The Count