accumulative scores
In accumulative tournaments where the necessary score is a few times bigger than the starting bankroll experienced players achieve most of their edge by correct estimation of what is needed to advance. This requires specific betting plan, part of which is utilizing progression in a way that there is no excess winning when last “do or die” bet is made.
Scores of accumulative tournaments will vary depending on type of players and the widespread of consensus of what is needed.
It is usually better to slightly overshoot than trying to just meet the number, especially when a high multiplier of your starting bankroll is needed. For example, you got an idea that the desired number is five times your original bankroll – this still may be not enough because of a “fluke” of others being extremely aggressive/lucky and 20% of the times you will not advance even if you reach your goal. If you set your goal at five and half time of the starting bankroll you will get there 10% less often but others would beat you only 5% of the times – overall a better strategy. Still, you need to come up with a right number to begin with.
In tournament you inquire about setting the right number is a bit tricky. Without any additional information of the scores made in the previous tournaments and type of players I would set it at $750. You can wait a few hands for a better deck(s) composition, bet 250 until your bankroll is 750 or you bust. You will reach the goal about two thirds of the times and this will get you advancement in more than 90% of tournaments, so you total chances are well over 60%.
An average player would advance 18/48th, which is 37.5%. You will be almost twice as good as the average.
Good luck,
S. Yama