Wong
Tootsie,
The way this thread has taken off you are going to get more post than the one about Oklahoma tournaments. Nothing wrong with Oklahoma but it is a pisser to keep reading about it when you live in Manchester England.
So let us go back to see what started it all.
Stanford Wong (Who the majority on here would say wrote the bible on Blackjack Tournament Strategy) starts writing about the technique of dice throwing. Noman and other writers on this site have made their position clear about this and now doubt the author’s credibility.
If a new player joined the site and asked what books would you advise him/her to read at the moment on Blackjack tournament play, what would we all recommend?
Joe Pane has said on here that you have to go beyond Wong to win at a competitive level and forthcoming books by Hollywood Dave and Ken Smith will probably reflect this.
Well maybe Wong’s book is a little bit dated but it is the blue print for all others that will follow.
Just for my mate Noman I will come back to dice manipulation. For the record Stanford Wong was the biggest sceptic of dice control until he attended a course run by Frank Scoblete. Then his view changed so maybe he knows something that we don’t.
So back to my original question on this thread for which I never received an answer.
Why would some of the top gaming authors such as Stanford Wong or Henry Tamburin extol the virtues of dice control knowing that it would leave them open to ridicule and critism by their fellow peers and players?
Don’t tell me it’s for money or self-promotion because I am not buying into that (Wong could have wrote about many other subjects on gaming) and not left himself open to this.
Andy
Ps Sorry Noman for using you as an example, but it is interesting.
PPs Off to the Czech Republic for a week. See you all soon.
Tootsie,
The way this thread has taken off you are going to get more post than the one about Oklahoma tournaments. Nothing wrong with Oklahoma but it is a pisser to keep reading about it when you live in Manchester England.
So let us go back to see what started it all.
Stanford Wong (Who the majority on here would say wrote the bible on Blackjack Tournament Strategy) starts writing about the technique of dice throwing. Noman and other writers on this site have made their position clear about this and now doubt the author’s credibility.
If a new player joined the site and asked what books would you advise him/her to read at the moment on Blackjack tournament play, what would we all recommend?
Joe Pane has said on here that you have to go beyond Wong to win at a competitive level and forthcoming books by Hollywood Dave and Ken Smith will probably reflect this.
Well maybe Wong’s book is a little bit dated but it is the blue print for all others that will follow.
Just for my mate Noman I will come back to dice manipulation. For the record Stanford Wong was the biggest sceptic of dice control until he attended a course run by Frank Scoblete. Then his view changed so maybe he knows something that we don’t.
So back to my original question on this thread for which I never received an answer.
Why would some of the top gaming authors such as Stanford Wong or Henry Tamburin extol the virtues of dice control knowing that it would leave them open to ridicule and critism by their fellow peers and players?
Don’t tell me it’s for money or self-promotion because I am not buying into that (Wong could have wrote about many other subjects on gaming) and not left himself open to this.
Andy
Ps Sorry Noman for using you as an example, but it is interesting.
PPs Off to the Czech Republic for a week. See you all soon.